Changes between Version 34 and Version 35 of Performance


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2011-07-15T19:20:50Z (14 years ago)
Author:
zooko
Comment:

add a few more performance notes

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Performance

    v34 v35  
    2727Also François Deppierraz has run a few benchmarks. (Can't find a link to his results.)
    2828
     29Jeff Darcy benchmarked Tahoe-LAFS vs. his new CloudFS (based on Gluster) vs. encfs vs. ecryptfs vs. Gluster, using iozone: https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cloudfs-devel/2011-June/000097.html https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cloudfs-devel/2011-June/000099.html
     30
     31Ticket #932 (benchmark Tahoe-LAFS compared to nosql dbs) is a ticket to run the standard "YCSB" benchmarks for nosql databases on Tahoe-LAFS.
     32
    2933What we ''really'' want, of course, is automated benchmarks that get executed at regularly scheduled intervals, or whenever a new patch is committed to revision control, or both. This would ideally run on some dedicated hardware or at least on some virtualized hardware which had a fairly consistent load of other tenants, so that the resulting measurements would not get too much noise from other people's behavior. You can see on Performance/Old that we used to have such an automated setup, including graphs of the resulting performance.