Changes between Version 40 and Version 41 of Performance


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2013-12-25T18:56:21Z (10 years ago)
Author:
zooko
Comment:

tracify and/or relativize links

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Performance

    v40 v41  
    77In late 2010 Kyle Markley did some benchmarking of what were then the release candidates for Tahoe-LAFS v1.8.0. This helped us catch two major performance regressions in Brian's New Downloader and helped make Tahoe-LAFS v1.8.0 into an excellent new release (see epic ticket #1170 for mind-numbing details). Kyle also contributed code for his benchmarking scripts (in Perl), but nobody to my knowledge has yet tried to re-use that script.
    88
    9 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-July/004776.html
    10 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-July/004781.html
    11 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-July/004782.html
    12 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-July/004838.html
    13 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/004853.html
    14 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/004985.html
    15 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/005007.html
    16 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/005011.html
    17 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-September/005155.html
    18 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-September/005162.html
     9* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-July/004776.html]
     10* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-July/004781.html]
     11* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-July/004782.html]
     12* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-July/004838.html]
     13* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/004853.html]
     14* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/004985.html]
     15* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/005007.html]
     16* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/005011.html]
     17* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-September/005155.html]
     18* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-September/005162.html]
    1919
    2020We also experimented with different segment sizes and immutable uploader pipeline depths, and the results tentatively confirmed that the current segment size (128 KiB) and immutable uploader pipeline depth (50,000 B) were better on both of Kyle's networks than any of the alternatives that Kyle tried.
    … …  
    2222Along the way Terrell Russell did some benchmarking and contributed a bash script which I used several times during the process:
    2323
    24 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1170#comment:81
     24* [comment:81:ticket:1170]
    2525
    2626At about the same time Nathan Eisenberg of Atlas Networks did a couple of manual benchmarks:
    2727
    28 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/004929.html
    29 * http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/004930.html
     28* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/004929.html]
     29* [//pipermail/tahoe-dev/2010-August/004930.html]
    3030
    3131Also François Deppierraz has run a few benchmarks. (Can't find a link to his results.)