Changes between Version 20 and Version 21 of WeeklyMeeting

Timestamp:

2012-11-12T04:39:36Z (11 years ago)

Author:

zooko

Comment:

change time to 15:00Z, add Agenda for 2012-11-15, soften Etiquette

WeeklyMeeting

@@ -5 +5 @@
 ||= Who =||Core developers or interested community members||
 ||= What =||Dev Topics Meeting||
-||= When =||Thursdays 16:30Z (8:30am Pacific)||
+||= When =||Thursdays 16:00Z (8:00am Pacific) (NOTE: time has changed (again). Previously, it was 16:30Z)||
 ||= Where =||Google Hangout, IRC fallback (see below)||
 ||= Why =||Voice/video interaction complements IRC/mailing list||
@@ -12 +12 @@
 == Etiquette ==
 
-* Strive to follow the established agenda.
+* It's okay to talk about things not on the pre-arranged agenda. (But it helps to announce in advance if you know there's something you'll want to talk about! It encourages other interested people to prepare and to join in.)
 * Participants may have high latency; if you'd like to speak, say "turn" or raise your hand and wait for silence.
-* Be respectful.
 * Use IRC for textual chat *not* the hangout chat feature.
 
@@ -21 +20 @@
 URL: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/04cdd3e81a07cd9adb8bd177a37e06b7a5b21e9d?authuser=0&hl=en#
 
-Upcoming:
+Upcoming: 2012-11-15
 
 This will be a ''NUTS AND BOLTS'' meeting — engineering, debugging, making stable releases, etc. If you're more into ''TESLA COILS AND CORPSES'' then stay tuned for a future meeting about science, big new features, writing papers about our work, etc.
 
-* #1240; Is it done? (I think it still needs fixed tests.) Can we commit it to trunk and be done with it? Do we need to merge it with #1679?
-* #1679; Let's write a test for it! Has The Dod had continuous good service since he applied the patch? Has nejucomo tried reproducing his bug and applying the patch?
+Agenda:
 
-To prepare for this meeting: read the two tickets, write some unit tests for them, post your patches. ☺
+What can we do to move Tahoe-LAFS v1.10 along? Is David-Sarah too busy with LeastAuthority.com to be Release Manager for Tahoe-LAFS v1.10? Should Tahoe-LAFS v1.10 contain only patches that are already on trunk?
 
 == Proposed Future Topics ==
@@ -39 +37 @@
 
 == Notes / Archives ==
+
+=== 2012-11-08 ===
+
+* #1240; Is it done? (I think it still needs fixed tests.) Can we commit it to trunk and be done with it? Do we need to merge it with #1679?
+* #1679; Let's write a test for it! Has The Dod had continuous good service since he applied the patch? Has nejucomo tried reproducing his bug and applying the patch?
 
 === 2012-11-01 ===