#4135 new defect

latest zfec fails on oraclelinux-8 builder

Reported by: meejah Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone: undecided
Component: packaging Version: n/a
Keywords: Cc:
Launchpad Bug:

Description

Two options:

  • pin to older zfec on that platform (possible?)
  • no longer care about that platform (delete builder)

Change History (8)

comment:1 Changed at 2024-12-03T17:55:14Z by blaisep

Apparently Fedora also depends on this.

comment:2 Changed at 2024-12-09T14:56:02Z by btlogy

Would this not be fixed by dropping support for Python 3.8 (EOL) in favor of 3.9: see #4131?

But if the answer is yes, I'm not sure who else than JP could publish a new tahoelafsci image in Docker Hub: see #4142 trying to sort this out.

comment:3 Changed at 2024-12-09T16:42:42Z by btlogy

Since I had bumped into problem related to Pyhon 3.8 while trying the oraclelinux-8 unit test on GHA instead of CircleCI last week, I've already tried and successfully bumped to python 3.9. The CI job went well, effectively pulling zfec==1.6.0.0:

https://github.com/LeastAuthority/tahoe-lafs/actions/runs/12144760020/job/33871805207?pr=8

So, it seem like the smallest change would be to bump Python 3.8 to 3.9 for this oraclelinux builder, publish the new image and current unit test should got green with the latest zfec.

See ticket:4131 and PR#1406

comment:4 Changed at 2024-12-09T16:43:02Z by btlogy

  • Owner set to btlogy

comment:5 Changed at 2024-12-09T16:43:51Z by btlogy

  • Component changed from unknown to packaging

comment:6 Changed at 2024-12-13T11:36:47Z by btlogy

From the build logs of PR#1406, I can confirm that latest zfec==1.6.0.0 is now successfully used to build and unit test tahoe-lafs on oraclelinx-8.

So we can close this ticket whenever PR#1406 (pending on PR#1409) is merged.

comment:7 Changed at 2024-12-16T11:48:45Z by btlogy

  • Owner btlogy deleted

The proposed PR#1406 has been rejected in favor or a new one PR#1418 in has NOT re-activated oraclelinux-8 builder (using zfec==1.6.0.0 as described in the previous comment).

This missing part could be completed in the context of ticket:4143.

comment:8 Changed at 2024-12-17T17:17:48Z by meejah

1406 was not "rejected", the draft PR was closed by mistake (and since re-opened, by me even though I said "please re-open if I got this wrong" when closing it in the first place).

Last edited at 2024-12-17T20:18:53Z by meejah (previous) (diff)
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.