#3645 closed defect (fixed)

Elaborate on the motivation for "Great Black Swamp" in the proposed specification

Reported by: exarkun Owned by: GitHub <noreply@…>
Priority: normal Milestone: Non-Foolscap communications
Component: unknown Version: n/a
Keywords: Cc:
Launchpad Bug:


The spec says that the goal is to "simplify the task of implementing a Tahoe-LAFS storage server" by making this possible "without a Foolscap implementation".

Add a little bit of detail here so folks don't have to be an expert in Foolscap and HTTP to see the win.

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed at 2021-03-30T19:08:53Z by meejah

  • Milestone changed from undecided to non-Foolscap communications

comment:2 Changed at 2021-04-04T20:36:34Z by GitHub <noreply@…>

  • Owner set to GitHub <noreply@…>
  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

In b5f214af/trunk:

Merge pull request #1011 from LeastAuthority?/3645.gbs-expanded-motivation

Add expanded motivation for GBS

Fixes: ticket:3645

comment:3 Changed at 2021-05-02T13:45:19Z by maylee

  • Milestone changed from non-Foolscap communications to Non-Foolscap communications

Milestone renamed

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.